On Monday, the House passed the bilateral law and shared the non-sensitive sharing of the sexually explicit images and videos of others-to order the AI-exposed images known as “Dipfakes”-to order to remove them quickly.
The vote of 409 to 2 has cleared this step for President Trump, who was expected to sign it quickly.
The goal of this law, known as the Take It Down Act, will be cracked by sharing the components known as “revenge porn”, social media companies and online platforms will remove these national images within two days of notifying them.
The move unanimously passed the Senate in February by combining an impossible alliance of the conservative and liberal of both sides. Mr. Trump’s support, who mentioned this during his joint speech in the Congress last month, seems to have smooth his path through Congress.
The Act, introduced by Senators of Texas Republican Ted Cruise and Minnesota Democrat, is the first Internet Material Act to clear Congress from 2018, when lawmakers approved the law to fight online sexual trafficking. And although it focuses on revenge porn and dipfkes, the bill has been viewed as an important step towards internet companies for decades, which have been saved from the government investigation for decades.
Mrs. Clobucher said that she brought the bill to the notice of Mr Trump and the first woman Melania Trump while talking to them at the opening day.
The senator said that he was inspired by the stories of the families who were harassed, bullying or mental and mental damage because of these images.
The law, in an interview, said in an interview, “One of the first time was that we were actually doing something on consumer technology issues that are meaningful.”
The irrelevant support for The Tech It Down Act highlights the anger of the affected images of the lawyers, especially for the hosting of lawyers on social media platforms such as Facebook, Instagram and X, especially for children and adolescents.
Although revenge porn and dipfkes influence adults and minors in the same way, both were especially strong for adolescent girls because the expansion of the “noodication” applications is widely available to their female classmates to self -sacrifice and then promotes them.
Florida Republican Representative Maria Elvira Salajar, who launched an associate bill in the house, said on Monday that the bill would stop abusing and harassing young girls “spreading” fire.
“Mrs. Salazar said,” “A young man, weak woman, face, voice, comparison – using images, engraving them and simply for revenge is seriously ill using images to humiliate them publicly for fun. “
The passage of the bill echoes similar efforts in the Statehouses across the country. Except for South Carolina, each state has a law that makes revenge porn criminals. And there are at least 20 state laws that addressed the sexually clear depths.
The system, which passed on Monday, is part of a one -year bilateral effort by lawmakers to solve Dipfake pornography. Mr. Cruz and Mrs. Cloquent launched the first bill last year, when it passed the Senate but died in the Republican -led house. This year it was re -introduced and it appeared to achieve speed after Mrs. Trump’s support, who focused on the use of youth mental health problems, cyber bullying and social media.
Alexandria Okasio-Corrtez, a Millennium Democrat representative from New York, also introduced the law last year, which allowed sexually deepened people to suit them and shared people. This bill has not been restarted this year.
In recent years, lawmakers have rallied around several bills to protect children online from sexual exploitation, bullying and addictive algorithms. In January 2021, the CEO of Meta, Tikatok and other technology companies defended their platforms and testified to angry lawmakers.
At the hearing, Matter Chief Executive Mark Zuckerberg was forced to apologize to their children’s lost parents from online losses.
Some lecturers have warned that this step can cool the free expression, saying that this national law can force non -sensitive sex images to remove valid images in addition to non -sensitive sex images.
Baca Branum, deputy director of the Free Expression Project of the Center for Democracy and Technology, said, “Online constitutional speech and privacy cannot create the best objectives for the dangerous effects of the bill.”
Mrs. Branum added that the tech-down law was “a recipe for weapons applied that makes sustainable progress in the fight against image-based sexual abuse.”
The two Republican representatives voted against the bill: Missouri representative Eric Berlison and Kentaki Thomas Massi. Mr. Massi said in a social media post that he believed that the law was “slippery open, with ripe for abuse, with involuntary consequences.”
Leave a Reply