On Thursday, digital publisher GEF Davis filed a lawsuit against the Open AA on the back of tech sites like Massable, PCMAG and Lifehaca, who joined a wave of media agencies on Thursday, accusing artificial intelligence giants of stealing its contents.
GEF Davis is one of the largest publishers in the United States, more than 5 sites worldwide, attracting an average of 212 million viewers per month and one of the largest media agencies by imposing demands against the OpenAI.
(The New York Times has sued Microsoft and its partner Microsoft, demanding copyright violation of news content on the AI system. Two companies have denied the case.)
The 62-page charges filed in the Federal Court of the Open are included in the OPNA, where the OPNA is included, saying that the technology company has developed “intentionally and relentlessly properly and developed Davis Works’ derivatives,” the publisher’s copyrights and their businesses reduce its business. It claimed that Open was used to train its artificial intelligence models and used GEF Davis content to train and create reactions through its popular Chatzipt chatboat.
The allegations said, “Open is the one who has taken every step that they violate the rights and laws of Jeff Davis’s intellectual property,” it is alleged.
According to the two familiar with the matter, the company is seeking at least a million dollars in its case.
A spokesman for the Openai said in a statement that its models were “on the basis of fair use”, referring to the legal value for the use of copyrighted material.
The statement said, “Chatzipi enables human creativity, enables scientific invention and treatment research and enable millions of people to improve their daily lives,” the statement said.
Many executives of the publishing industry, which are deeply disrupted by the great adoption of technologies such as search and social media, have considered the growing popularity of artificial intelligence with increasing concerns. Strong AI systems created by companies like OpenAI have been trained in copyrighted materials, drawing from many media companies.
These companies usually respond to one way in two ways: publisher of the Wall Street Journal, in the case of News Corporation, or to confirm their rights in intellectual property, deals with their contents to licensed their contents for several million dollars in organizations.
Many of these claims are still working on their way through the court. This month, the US judicial panel has integrated several demands against the Open, including the Times.
Jeff Davis officials have been considering which path to be taken for months, a man said. The company has decided to sue in this section in the hope that other publishers will follow.
Leave a Reply