Washington – President Trump told the Supreme Court on Thursday to allow his administration policy Forbidden Hijra people may be effective from serving in the military as the legal challenges of the ban are proceeding.
The request for the Supreme Court intervention prevented the Trump administration in implementing nationwide sanctions after a federal appeal was left in a lower court order. The judges of the Federal District Court have attacked the administration on these extensive orders known as nationwide or universal sanctions issued as a policies for the country.
Mr. Trump banned working in the military for the first term in the Hijra people’s office, which is the Supreme Court in 2019 Has been allowed to be implemented, But The policy was withdrawn Former President Joe Biden wrote. When Mr. Trump returned to the office in January in January, he issued a new executive order that “Troop’s preparation, death, solidarity, honesty, humility, humility and integrity, declared it as a policy policy, and said that the policy on the Dioforia, including Dioforia, and arms, with arms. “
The president’s directive states that “to accept a person’s sexual conflict with a soldier’s commitment to a person’s sexual conflict with the view of a man, even in a person’s personal life.”
On the basis of the President’s order, the Defense Department issued a new policy in February, which usually disqualified from gender dysphoria or military service that had interfered for gender dysphoria. Defense Secretary Pete Hegsth had to start the identification of all military branch transgender service members and separate the process of separating them from their service if they did not waive on March 2 march.
According to a January report from the Congressional Research Service, the active customs members of about 1,892 army got sexualization from the Defense Department from January 2016 to 2021. The judiciary says that the Pentagon’s gender identity does not have data on service members, but a defense officer said that there were about 4,200 soldiers who were caught in the gender dysphoria by December 9. According to the Defense Department, the military has more than 1.2 million active customs members.
Between 20 and 2021, the Defense Department on Feb 22, according to Pentagon’s Feb memo, spent $ 52 million on care for the treatment of gender for the treatment of gender dysfuria.
Prior to the Supreme Court, the case raised a challenge for the sanctions filed in the state of Washington, which came with seven Ezra services members, a Hijra man who would like to join the military and an Advocacy Group. They argued that the President’s ban violates the Constitution’s equal protection and guarantee of the first amendment.
In March a Federal District Court agreed to block the implementation of the executive order and was needed to maintain the policies by the Trump administration’s predecessor.
According to him, the US District Judge Benzamin Settle granted the initial order ban that the Trump administration did not provide any evidence that the Hijra had not allowed the people to be affected by the affected military preparation, unit solidarity or lethal.
“The relentless reliance on the government’s relentless dependence on military trials reflected in military sanctions, which was equally considered and unquestioned, as an undoubted judgment, was the same as the same military, before allowing the same military forces (and thousands of thousands) before allowing it open.”
Settle was appointed by President George W. Bush Tacoma to the District Court and was the commander of the US Army Judge Advocate General Corps, he served as a prosecutor in North Carolina’s Fort Brag and was Defense Consultant in Washington.
According to him, the plaintiffs wrote that the plaintiffs could succeed in the qualities of their claims and they said that they had raised “serious and important questions.”
“Since the military has been conducted for four years under the Austin policy, the Hijra service may face any problem compared to the hardships imposed on members of the service and otherwise qualified transgender candidates, compared to any problem,” he said.
The judiciary then asked the US court to break the decision for the ninth circuit, allowing it to implement the ban, but it denied the request.
The Challenges of Mr Trump’s ban were filed in Washington, DC’s Federal District Court, where it was ImplementThe However, Washington’s Federal Appellate court temporarily agreed to stop the order, and on Tuesday hearing that the appeal should be kept in place on Tuesday.
During his urgent application to the Supreme Court, Solister General D Johor Sauar argued that the court should “give considerable respect” to the defense department’s military judgment.
He wrote, “The suspension is missing, the universal order of the District Court will be for the ninth circuit and the further review period in this court – it has been for a long time to maintain a policy for the military that it may be in its professional judgment, military regeneration and the country’s interests,” he wrote.
Solar rejected the claim that the administration rules discriminate based on Ezra status and gender and say that the policy draws the classification on the basis of a treatment condition – gender dysphoria – and related treatment intervention, which means that it satisfies the minimum, most prestigious standard of judicial review.
“The Constitution is authorized to determine the essay of the armed forces by giving the Constitution to the political branch.” Yet the order of the district court forced the military to maintain a separate policy – the decision that the department has made is inconsistent with the ‘best interests of military service’ and ‘national protection interests’. “
The Supreme Court has filed a plaintiff until May 1 to respond to the Trump administration’s request for emergency relief.
Leave a Reply