President Trump has said that the new trade agreement in the United States may be close to the announcement of the new trade agreement because his administration may face pressure to deal with the country’s economic partners before one 90 days break The tariff ends on July 9.
Wednesday, Mr Trump said in a true social post that he would announce a “big trade agreement” with a “big, highly respected country”. He said with another post on the social media platform on Thursday that it should be “too big and America is exciting day for the United States and the United Kingdom“And the deal will be full and wider.”
Mr Trump was supposed to make a formal announcement at the White House on Thursday morning.
Mr. Trump and his team with foreign leaders in Canada and his team may be the first to overtakes with the UK with Mr. Trump and his team, ItalySince the partners of India, Japan and other businesses have announced its announcement “Day of Release” Customs 2 April.
For BusinessCustomers and investors, progress on the trade front may not come enough in running soon Uncertainty Where the US economy is running. A 10% baseline duty on most imported products has been effective from April 5, while so -called Mutual tariff Against other countries – with China is the exception – Is given to break Until July.
China has so far hit the country the most by US tariffs. Mr. Trump has imposed tariffs As high as 145% In Chinese imports, the country fired at 125% tariff on American products. US trade war with manufacturing giants is already influenced on American businesses and customers. Due to tariffs, extensive initiatives have announced to raise prices, and experts have warned about potential epidemic-tribes Lack of supply Come early in summer.
Where does the discussion stand?
The Trump administration has floated a few different timelines for the announcement of the agreement, but it has not specified a date or country.
“I would be surprised if the Treasury Secretary Scott Besent told the lawyers on Tuesday that those who were bound by the end of the year were not more than 5% or 5% of them.”
Some experts, however, believe that the discussion will take longer.
Han-Ku Yeho, a senior fellow at the Peterson Institute for International Economics, believes that the country that the Trump administration is discussing with the country will slowly move on to their trade discussions. Former South Korean Commerce Minister CBS Moneywatch told these agreements because of the long -term impact.
According to Eurasia Group President Ian Bremerner, some countries may be encouraged to work fast, though the discussion will drag in June as a result of the discussion.
“In the face of the discussion everyone is asked to submit letters to their ‘best offers,” Breaper CBS Moneywatch told an email, “And the small countries that are desperate/compliant with the required contracts.”
Who is discussing in the United States?
Besent told the House Committee on Tuesday that the United States has “important business relationships” and is currently discussing 17 to reach deals. “Many of our trading partners have come to us with very good offers and we are in the process of rebuilding them,” he said.
The Trump administration has discussed trade and tariffs with Canada, Italy, India, Japan and the United Kingdom in recent weeks.
It is not clear which deals will be announced first, but Clayton Allen, who has covered politics and policies in Washington for the Eurasia Group, has long been asked to find a contract with countries involved in trade negotiations with Japan, South Korea, UK and India – the United States.
Eurasia has predicted an agreement with Japan could come in mid -June.
China is missing from the discussion
What cleaned in the Congress on Tuesday is that the United States has not yet entered into an active trade discussion with China. President Trump said in April that he spoke to Chinese President Xi Jinping in the tension of the tariff, but China has denied Any discussion between Beijing and Washington was discussed.
The Treasury Secretary, however, is about to meet a high-level Chinese delegation this weekend while discussing trade in Switzerland, the Trump administration announced on Tuesday.
A post meeting of the Chinese Embassy in X is confirmed. “Global expectations, China’s interest and US business community and customers have decided to agree on being involved with #Chinese #US parties in the entire discretion of the appeal,” the posts are written. “As China’s leadership on China-US economic and trade issues, Vice Premier He will discuss with the US Treasury Secretary Scott Besent during Lifeng 9 to 12 May.”
What could the trade agreements look like?
Although it is hard to predict what may be included in a potential tariff agreement, YO, who has helped to ordered to organize several bilateral and mulitral trade negotiations in the past, says that these national agreements are probably the “gentlemen ‘contracts.
In other words, issuing additional tariffs in the United States can only come to an agreement with a trading partner for the rebuilding.
“The Framework Agreement is just as great as you wrote it is a beautiful paper,” said Eurasian Allen. “Trade agreements are very complex animals and you are about to get the top line agreement on some of the main issues of concern with the promise of concern to discuss and discuss other issues,” he said.
Ohio Rep. Asked about Dave Joyce for the format of the contract on Tuesday, Besent said “I hope we will see enough reduction in the tariff we are charged, as well as nonterph barriers, currencies and subsidies for both labor and capital investment” “
More details related to tariffs may come soon. During the meeting of the Oval Office with Canadian Prime Minister Mark Karni TuesdayMr. Trump said his team would spell a fixed tariff rate for each country – though he made it clear that the number could be adjusted in the future.
“It’s going to be a very fair number, it will be a fewer numbers,” said the President. “We don’t want to hurt countries, we want to help countries. We want to be friendly with countries.”
Leave a Reply